Different presses are known for having a strong catalogue in certain areas
MIT Press known for arts criticism, new media, STS
Trust that they've gone through some review, editing
Positive comments
Empathetic voice
Transparently laid out thought process and struggles
Acknowledging the bounded nature of the timeline; so many people try to make things more important than they are; strong grasp of what trolling is not
Outed her brother as an Internet troll in the first paragraph
Good job not sensationalizing 4chan, matter of fact, matched own experiences, built trust in reader
Rapport with field, rapport with reader
Anthro perspective: emic, etic
Telling two parallel stories, then at the end saying they're the same
Mix of things I was more familiar with (media studies/ecology), kinda familiar with (media industry, anthro), less familiar with (folklore, commodity fetishism)
Engagement with history, and its own standing as a historical moment
Method
Details about how she achieved a balance; distance
"My trolls" and getting critique from them; want details about what they were critical of, what she changed