Setup
- Thinking about Black technology use in a way not framed as lack, deficiency, or digital divide
- Not a comms background; info & lib sci PhD from UIUC (same as Roberts; Leigh Star, Lisa Nakamura used to be there); same Georgia Tech dept as Ian Bogost, Fox Harrell
- Google Scholar good for tracking down a particular scholar's work; citation number standards vary across fields, can't tell if cite means love it or critique it; books aren't represented well
Meta
- Audience: academics; specialist language; lots of hat-tipping to others
- Assumes people know political economy, perhaps more useful in a dissertation
- Intervention for scholars of media and for scholars of race
- How authors deploy different voice and style, maybe anticipating how they'll be read
Positivity round
Oops I took a call lol
Discussion
- What do we need to pay more attention to in studies of race and technology?
- jouissance (more than affect) — we're missing energy and vibes
- Approach reading like you're riding a wave; hang out and see where you come out on the other side
Libidinal economy
- Not about instrumentality, rationality, productivity
- Freud really got us to take the unseen seriously; tapping into the unseen as a powerful modality in social experience
- Whole bunch of stuff of our lives, offline and online, not getting dealt with; by not having these on the table, you might come away telling really weird partial stories
- "This feels so much like Jose Munoz's excellent twist to queer joy in queer studies"
- There are different ways to use technology
- It's not that we can't talk about exclusion, but that we need a framework to talk about the other stuff, that take the libidinal as legit
- See the present for the vibrancy that's there; not the deferral of Afrofuturism